| |
 |
|
| |
| Middle
Kingdom Karnak |
| |
|
Whatever buildings stood at Karnak before the New Kingdom
have long since been swept away, mainly by later pharaohs
who needed the space for their own constructions. Whole
buildings were utterly demolished and monumental gateways
levelled to the ground. Fortunately, a lot of the stonework
was used as ballast to form the rubble core of the giant
New Kingdom pylons and it has proved possible to reconstruct
some of them. The religious sensibilities of the Egyptians
forbade the destruction of objects that had once been
dedicated to the god, so a good deal of statuary and
other votives have been found buried in ritual deposits
within the temple grounds. The most notable of these
is La Cour de la Cachette where over 900 statues
and statuettes were recovered in 1903 (click the plan,
right, for its location). |
| |
| The
Middle Kingdom Court |
| |
| The
temple at Karnak was known as Ipet-esut (‘Most
Select of Places’). No one knows for certain when
the earliest one was built but it seems likely that
there was at least a shrine there during the Old Kingdom
if not before. Like most Egyptian temples, it was oriented
towards the river—in this case, it faced roughly
east. By New Kingdom times, however, there was a second
avenue of approach, from the north where the sanctuary
of Mut and the Luxor Temple were situated. It is so
far unknown whether or not this alternate axis was present
in earlier periods. |
| |
|
The earliest extant remains belong to Dynasty
XII but they cover a number of earlier floor levels.
At the rear of the Festival Hall of Tuthmosis
III (Dynasty XVIII) is a relief known as the Karnak
King List, which shows the pharaoh along with
some of his predecessors. These include seven
from the Old Kingdom Period and six from DynastyXI.
It is very plausible to assume that the reason
why these particular pharaohs were chosen while
others were omitted, is because they had built
there. One of the reliefs at the mortuary temple
of Mentuhotep I at Deir el-Bahri depicts the barque
procession from the ‘Beautiful Festival
of the Valley’, when the statue of Amun-Re
is taken across the river to visit the temples
of the divine pharaohs, and there are references
to it in a number of contemporary inscriptions
found on the west |
|
Relief
of a Barque Procession from the Temple
of Mentuhotep I at Deir el-Bahri
(after Dieter Arnold)
|
|
|
|
bank. The festival was established by Mentuhotep and
it is inconceivable that he would not have provided
a fitting home for the god at the same time. |
| |
| While
the pharaohs of Dynasty XI were careful to pay proper
respect to Amun it is clear that their principal allegiance
was to Montu, the local warrior god. They took their
names from him—Mentu-hotep (‘Montu is |
| |
content’)—and founded temples in his
name at nearby Armant and Tod. It was not until
the accession of Amenemhat I, the founder of the
Twelfth Dynasty that Amun’s standing really
began to rise. As his name indicates, Amenemhat
(‘Amun is at the head’) was particularly
devoted to him and so were his successors, three
of whom bore the same name. The divine aspect
was combined with that of Re-Atum, the great sun-god
of Heliopolis, to produce Amun-Re who now reign
supreme in the land. |
|
| |
|
| Aerial
of Karnak showing the location of the Middle Kingdom
Court (©GoogleEarth) |
| |
| Thanks
to the activities of later pharaohs who enlarged and
‘improved’ the original construction, there
is little left of the Middle Kingdom buildings—a
few traces of the temple itself and the broken stones
of the so-called White Chapel of Senusret I (1971-1926
BC). Senusret was known as a prolific builder and left
his mark from one end of the country to the other. He
rebuilt the Temple of Re-Atum at Heliopolis, erecting
a pair red granite obelisks there, and it seems likely
he was responsible for much of the construction at Karnak
as well. The Middle Kingdom temple sat in what is now
an open courtyard between the Sanctuary of Philip Arrhidaeus
and the Festival Hall. In recent years the area has
been investigated by the Franco-Egyptian Centre and
a report of their findings has been published by Luc
Gabolde (1998. Le ‘Grand Château d’Amon’
de Sésostris Ier à Karnak). |
| |
|
| Plan
of the Restored Middle Kingdom Temple |
| |
| Senusret’s
temple was built on a platform measuring approximately
40 metres square, which incorporated the remains of
an earlier but smaller one (10 x 10 metres) that probably
dates to the reign of Amenemhat I. Evidently the importance
of the cult of Amun increased dramatically at this time
and the required a more monumental dwelling place. The
temple was surrounded by a mud-brick enclosure wall
whose foundation walls, at least, still survive. Excavators
have recovered stone jambs and lintels for two small
gateways, one to the north and the other to the south.,
but the main entrance would have been to the west, towards
the river, as it was in all subsequent temples. A lintel
bearing the name of Senusret has been found (but not
in situ) that suggests it was rather imposing, perhaps
a pylon. |
| |
|
| Granite
thresholds of the Middle Kingdom Temple with the calcite
pedestal at the rear
(© UCLA Owned) |
| |
| The
building itself was made of limestone and
measured roughly 40 x 40 metres with walls
about 6 metres high. Apart from some of
the pavement of the courtyard, little remains
of the original structures—some decorated
stone fragments that had been used as fill
by later builders and a series of four thresholds
aligned along the main axis of the temple.
Investigations in the later storerooms to
the west of the courtyard, part of Hatshepsut’s
showed that the building had a porticoed
façade of twelve pillars with attached
Osiride statues of the pharaoh, one of which
was found in the foundations of the Sixth
Pylon. |
| |
| A
line of four red granite thresholds on the
main axis are all that survive of the interior
arrangements of the temple. Gabolde believes
that there was a peristyle court immediately
behind the façade. Fragments of square
pillars bearing reliefs along with the name
and titles of the king were found elsewhere
on the site (La Cour de la Cachette).
These are shorter than the Osiride pillars—no
doubt due to the fact that the floor level
of Egyptian temples tended to rise the deeper
into it one went. |
| |
| The
three red granite thresholds behind the
forecourt represent the entrances to a series
of three rooms—perhaps a shallow hypostyle
hall and a vestibule before a small room.
Until recently it had been assumed |
|
|
|
|
| Excavation
of the Middle Kingdom Court showing the
thresholds and earlier platform. |
|
| that
the latter was the sanctuary. Broken pieces
of a square calcite pedestal bearing inscriptions
of Senusret I were found nearby and at first
they were restored at the rear of the room.
It had grooves on the upper surface that
are most likely footings for a portable
wooden shrine to house the cult statue.
However, it is now apparent that it would
have been too large for the space available
and that the steps leading up to it would
have extended over the threshold. So it
is now believed that there was another door
in the north wall of the chamber which led
to another room oriented perpendicular to
the main axis and that the pedestal was
originally located here. Temples with such
a bent-axis approach to the inner sanctum
are not unknown in Egypt (although the other
examples are much later). |
| |
| The
temple built by Senusret probably remained
in use—albeit much modified—until
the temple went out of use at the beginning
of the Christian era. Elizabeth Blyth points
out that the limestone blocks used in its
construction were susceptible to water damage
|
|
from
the Nile flood and that it would have been much decayed
by the New Kingdom period. Sixteen-sided sandstone columns
found nearby were probably installed by Tuthmosis III
to replace the original pillars of the peristyle court.
Although they bore the name of Senusret this type of
column is unknown from the Middle Kingdom period but
was fairly common in Tuthmosis’ day. |
| |
| Suggested
Reading |
| |
| Blyth,
Elizabeth |
2006 |
Karnak,
The Evolution of a Temple |
| Dorman,
Peter F. & Betsy M. Bryan |
2007 |
Sacred
Space & Sacred Function in Ancient Thebes.
Studies in Oriental Civilization No. 61. Oriental
Institute.University of Chicago. |
| Strudwick,
Nigel & Helen |
1999 |
Thebes
in Egypt |
|
| |
 |