|
The
islands were first occupied at about the end of
the Sixth Millennium BC—radiocarbon dates
of about 5000 BC (4190+160 bc) was recovered from
material found alongside a wall at the early settlement
at Skorba. Presumably the first settlers arrived
even earlier. Sea voyages of considerable distance
and requiring considerable skill in navigation
are evident as early as the ninth millennium BC.
Obsidian is a type of volcanic glass, which was
highly prized for its appearance and the sharpness
of blades and points made from it. Each obsidian
source has its own unique composition and its
products can be clearly identified in the archaeological
record. Obsidian from the island of Melos in the
Aegean Sea turns up on the Greek mainland around
10,000 years ago—a voyage of a hundred kilometres
or so. It is no further from southern coast of
Sicily to Malta, the likeliest origin of the new
immigrants. The earliest pottery consists of an
Impressed Ware that was virtually identical to
the Stentinello variety used there. Evidently
overseas contacts were maintained throughout the
Neolithic—obsidian from the Lipari Islands,
to the north of Sicily, and from Pantelleria,
an island lying between Sicily and Tunisia, occur
regularly in the archaeological record.. However,
the amounts involved were quite small and contact
seems to diminish with time, perhaps due to a
cultural choice on the part of the inhabitants.
Left largely to themselves, their culture developed
along very idiosyncratic lines, culminating in
the construction of megalithic temples and rock
cut tombs.
Ghar
Dalam
The
cave of Ghar Dalam on the slopes of a valley running
down to what is now the container port of Birzebbuga
at the south-eastern end of Malta. It is at least
144 metres long but, because of inwashed silt, it
is impossible to say how far into the hillside it
goes. It was formed by water percolating through
and dissolving the Lower Coralline limestone during
the Pleistocene, perhaps half a million years ago.
Periodic flooding washed material into the cave
and six principal layers have been distinguished
through excavations conducted over the past century
or so.
|
|
The
lowest was a deposit of clay 125cm thick
containing impressions of plant material
but no bone. The layer above that, however,
was rich in some very exotic faunal remains
indeed. Most abundant were the bones of
a species of dwarf hippopotamus (Hippopotamus
melitensis) but there was also a pigmy elephant
(Elephas falconeri, shown left)
as well as both giant dormice and swans.
Just how these animals got to Malta is subject
to some debate. Was there a land bridge
in the distant past or did the float ashore
on flood debris? However they were introduced,
clearly a lot of local development took
place.
The
elephants and hippos apparently died out
at some time around 180,000 BP an event
marked in the cave by a pebble layer 35
cm thick. The fauna that were present in
the layer above the pebbles was entirely
different than previously. There was a species
of small deer, derived from the Red Deer
(Cervus Elephas) found on the European mainland.
There were also a few |
carnivores
such as brown bear, wolf and red fox but no sign
of any people at this point, around about 18,000
years ago. There is a thin calcareous lens, not
even a centimetre thick, and then you finally get
the kind of cultural debris that humans leave lying
around—flint tools, potsherds, amulets, etc.
This is mixed with the bones of domestic animals—sheep,
goat and cattle—all dating to no earlier than
ca. 5400 BC.
CHRONOLOGY
Unfortunately, almost all of the monuments under
discussion were excavated long before the introduction
of radiocarbon dating in the 1950’s, some
of them as early as the beginning of the 19th
century. Their relative chronology—the order
in which they were built—could be established
using traditional methods. These relied almost
exclusively on changing styles of pottery—their
form, fabric and decoration—and their stratigraphic
position in well-recorded excavations. Absolute
dating was pretty much a matter of guesswork until
the radiocarbon revolution. Radiocarbon dates
taken from more recently excavated sites with
similar pottery has enabled us to pin down the
chronology in more absolute terms. We now know
that the Maltese Neolithic covered a period of
nearly 3,000 years, from about 5200-2500 BC.
The pottery sequence was devised by John D. Evans
in the 1950’s and refined by David Trump
in the 1960’s. The material seems to fall
into three major cycles, each marked initially
by strong foreign influences but quickly settling
into a strictly local development. The simplest
explanation is to attribute these influences to
the arrival a fresh immigrants from Sicily. Each
phase is named after the site where it was first
discovered or is best represented.
|
|
Ghar
Dalam |
|
Grey
Skorba |
|
Red
Skorba |
|
Zebbug |
|
Mgarr |
|
Ggantija |
|
Saflieni |
|
Tarxien |
|
Tarxien
Cemetery |
|
|
c.
5200-4500 BC |
|
c.
4500-4400 BC |
|
c.
4400-4100 BC |
|
c.
4100-3700 BC |
|
c.
3800-3600 BC |
|
c.
3600-3200 BC |
|
c.
3300-3000 BC |
|
c.
3150-2500 BC |
|
c.
2400-1500 BC |
|
| EARLY
NEOLITHIC |
| |
| |
| TEMPLE
PERIOD |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| BRONZE
AGE |
|
|
Ghar
Dalam Sherd
Red
Skorba Bowl
|
|
Tarxien:
Biconical Bowl
Tarxien:
Pedestalled Bowl
Tarxien:
Amphora
|
|
Tarxien
Cemetery:Double Vase
|
|
|
Early
Neolithic
The pottery of the first settlers is known as
Ghar Dalam Ware, after the cave site where it
was first discovered. It is characterized by impressions
around the rim and neck of rather simple bowls
and globular jars. This type of decoration links
it directly with the Stentinello Ware of Sicily
and, more generally, with the larger family of
Impressed Wares found throughout the central and
western Mediterranean. The connection with the
homeland was soon lost, however, and the succeeding
Grey Skorba Phase is dominated by rather plain
vessels. This is succeeded by Red Skorba Ware,
which was slipped (dunked in a thin solution of
clay and water) and then burnished to a bright
red sheen. The fabric is different and there is
more variety in the shapes that were utilized—a
type of ladle with a tall forked handle rising
from the rim is fairly common. In some ways the
pottery is similar to the Diana Ware found on
Sicily but it may be coincidental.
Temple Period
The appearance of Zebbug Ware towards the end
of the Fifth Millennium BC marks a major break
with tradition and probably represent a further
influx of people. There is no continuity in fabric,
shape or decoration and it seems to have its roots
in Sicily once again. Decoration is prolific,
if somewhat sloppily applied, and includes painted
designs (red on a cream coloured slip) and grooves
infilled with white paste as well as incised patterns—including
some anthropomorphic designs. There is continuity
in many other aspects of the local culture—the
architecture and sculpture, for example—suggesting
the original occupants survived the process to
a greater or lesser degree.
Mgarr Ware is essentially a continuation of the
trends introduced in the previous phase but the
pottery is much darker, having been fired in a
reducing atmosphere. The difference may be purely
functional—kitchenware as opposed to dinner
service. In any event, the fabric of the pottery
in the following Ggantija Phase is identical but
the shapes are more varied and there is more decoration.
The designs were generally scratched in after
firing and were designed to hold a red ochre paste.
It was during this period that the first temples
suddenly appeared. Further developments take place
in the Saflieni Phase but the great explosion
of creativity comes with the Tarxien Phase, the
grand finale of the temple-building period. There
is an enormous range of shapes, including several
new ones such as pedestalled bowls, biconical
bowls and amphorae.
The end of the Temple Age, which occurred around
3500 BC, was apparently sudden and complete. The
material culture is entirely new—new styles
of pottery and the introduction of metal objects.
Temples were no longer built (they remained in
use but served an entirely different purpose)
and the dead were cremated rather than buried
in collective tombs. The mechanisms by which these
changes occurred is unknown—invasion and
bloody murder is only one of a number of options.
SETTLEMENT
Unfortunately,
although formal and ceremonial sites such as temples
and cemeteries have survived reasonably well in
Malta, domestic settlements have proved elusive.
What evidence we do have, apart from the material
that has survived at Ghar Dalam, comes from temple
sites. Generally speaking, this is mainly indirect
evidence—household rubbish such as pottery,
tools, charcoal, etc.—rather than architecture.
The best evidence comes from Skorba, which indicates
a considerable period of strictly domestic occupation
before the construction of the temple. Excavations,
conducted by David Trump from 1960-63, uncovered
over 2 metres of deposit with a pottery sequence
ranging from the Ghar Dalam to Ggantija phases.
Radiocarbon dates indicate the site was occupied
for a period of some 1,500 years.
Skorba:
Ground Plan of the Temples and earlier buildings
The earliest building was a small, oval hut about
6 metres long associated with Ghar Dalam sherds—only
the clay floor and partial traces of the surrounding
wall have survived subsequent ploughing. Also
associated with early domestic rubbish was an
11 metre long stretch of stone wall that is too
big to belong to a house and may have been part
of an enclosure wall (unfortunately, it runs under
the later temple). Two adjacent rooms were uncovered
just to the east of the temples—they were
oblong (8.4 x 5.4 metres; 5.6 x 3.2 metres) and
were enclosed within solid masonry. The interior
was filled with grey clay—the disintegrated
mud brick from the upper parts of the walls. There
were cobbled spaces to the east and west but no
hearths or other domestic furnishings. The presence
of figurines and goat skulls suggest a shrine,
ancestral to the later temples.
Skorba:
Aerial of Red Skorba huts
Subsistence
& Exchange
The
material from Skorba included grains of cultivated
barley, emmer and club wheat along with lentils.
Flint sickle blades and food processing equipment
such as querns and rubbing stones were also recovered.
All of the animal bones recovered from the site
belonged to domesticated species. Sheep and/or goat
(species notoriously difficult to distinguish in
an archaeological context) were the most common
but cattle were also present in significant numbers
as were pigs. No wild animals were represented in
the assemblage—the larger species had probably
been exterminated much earlier. Although mollusc
shells have been found elsewhere, no fish bones
|
were
recovered from the site—despite the
fact that Malta is entirely surrounded by
water. However, flotation, a technique designed
to recover micro artefacts such as these,
was not used in the early 1960’s.
Indirect evidence that fish may have been
part of the diet can be found in a relief
carving found at the temple at Bugibba (right).
Spindle whorls have also been recovered,
so we know that yarn was spun—coarse
wool was available and, perhaps, some sort
of vegetable fibre such as flax (linen).
|
The
evidence indicates an economy based on mixed farming,
probably at a subsistence level, with each family
supplying its own needs with a little surplus
for social obligations and bartering. Each family
also probably produced their own pottery and manufactured
their own bone or stone tools. They were not completely
cut off from the outside world, however, and a
number of exotic materials found on the islands
had to have been imported. These include obsidian
and pumice from the Lipari Islands along with
high quality flint and red ochre from Sicily.
There is even the odd sherd of Sicilian pottery,
probably from a container for some perishable
material. The motive was more likely to have been
to cement social arrangements through gift exchange
rather than economic. What the Maltese gave in
return is unknown.
Belief
Systems
| Evidence
from the pre-temple period that sheds any
light on belief systems is very scarce. Mention
has already been made of the possible shrine
at Skorba, which dates to the last half of
the fourth millennium BC, with its goat horns
and figurines. None of the figurines was intact
but they seem to depict a female figure with
swollen hips, minimal breasts and a very schematic
head (right). They are apparently
naked, with only what appears to be a girdle
around the waist and some incised lines that
probably represent necklaces—looking
very much like the ‘mother-goddess’
whose image is found throughout the Mediterranean.
The early farmers were very concerned with
matters of fertility and fecundity (sex and
reproduction) and saw the world in those terms.
The figurines represent the female half of
the equation with the male principle turning
up in the stone phalli found elsewhere—at
least, that is the case during the Temple
Period. |
|
There
was evidently a belief in the afterlife for a number
of collective burials in rock-cut tombs have been
discovered. The best-preserved of these was at Xaghra
where a tomb of the Zebbug Period was excavated
in 1988. A shaft 70 cm long led straight down to
a pair of oval chambers. The remains of 65 individuals
(54 adults and 11 children) were found—the
bones of earlier interments pushed aside to make
way for new ones who were laid out intact until
the flesh decomposed. The bones were liberally sprinkled
with red ochre—symbolic of blood and life—a
material that had to be imported from Sicily. The
burials were accompanied by grave goods consisting
of decorated pots (mainly from the Zebbug phase
but some as late as Ggantija) and personal ornaments.
The pots were almost all broken, the remains of
food offerings or funeral meals, while the ornaments
consisted of shell beads and pendants along with
sixteen miniature stone axes and six V-perforated
buttons. Just inside the entrance to one of the
chambers the excavators found a stone block with
a somewhat crude carving of a human face on it.
Presumably it was intended to stand guard over the
spirits of the dead.
(Back
to the Contents)
|